AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being –

  • 1.

    Boden, M. A. & Edmonds, E. A. What is generative art? Digital Creativity 20, 21–46 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2672–2680 (NIPS, 2014).

  • 3.

    Mirsky, Y. & Lee, W. The creation and detection of deepfakes: a survey. ACM Comput. Surveys 54, 1–41 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Karras, T. et al. Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 8110–8119 (IEEE, 2020).

  • 5.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Learning to speak fluently in a foreign language: multilingual speech synthesis and cross-language voice cloning. Preprint at (2019).

  • 6.

    Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Efros, A. A. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1125–1134 (IEEE, 2017).

  • 7.

    Zhu, J., Shen, Y., Zhao, D. & Zhou, B. In-domain GAN inversion for real image editing. Preprint at (2020).

  • 8.

    Ramesh, A. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 139, 8821–8831 (PMLR, 2021).

  • 9.

    Takahashi, D. Deepdub uses AI to localize voice dubbing for foreign language films. Venture Beat (16 December 2020);

  • 10.

    Dalí lives (via artificial intelligence) (Salvador Dali Museum, 2020);

  • 11.

    Westerlund, M. The emergence of deepfake technology: a review. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9, 40–53 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    McCammon, M. N. in The Handbook of Communication Rights, Law and Ethics Ch. 24 (Wiley, 2021);

  • 13.

    ReFace. Swap. Share. Hype. (accessed 10 July 2020).

  • 14.

    Pinscreen. The most advanced AI-driven virtual avatars. (accessed 8 October 2020).

  • 15.

    Emilia, P. Who is Lil Miquela, the digital avatar instagram influencer? (accessed 24 December 2020).

  • 16.

    Prajwal, K. R., Mukhopadhyay, R., Namboodiri, V. P. & Jawahar, C. A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild. In Proc. 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 484-492 (ACM, 2020);

  • 17.

    Osimo, S. A., Pizarro, R., Spanlang, B. & Slater, M. Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud—a virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Sci. Rep. 5, 13899 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Slater, M. et al. Virtually being Lenin enhances presence and engagement in a scene from the Russian revolution. Front. Robot. AI 5, 91 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M. & Slater, M. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 779–787 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Pataranutaporn, P., Vega Gálvez, T., Yoo, L., Chhetri, A. & Maes, P. Wearable wisdom: an intelligent audio-based system for mediating wisdom and advice. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–8 (ACM, 2020);

  • 21.

    Soulmachines Inc. (accessed 25 April 2021).

  • 22.

    Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. & Ryan, R. M. Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychol. 26, 325–346 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Skinner, E. A. & Belmont, M. J. Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J. Educ. Psychol. 85, 571–581 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. Research commentary: technology-mediated learning—a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 1–10 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Hudson, I. & Hurter, J. Avatar types matter: review of avatar literature for performance purposes. In Proc. International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality 14–21 (Springer, 2016).

  • 26.

    Kosmyna, N., Gross, A. & Maes, P. ‘The thinking cap 2.0’ preliminary study on fostering growth mindset of children by means of electroencephalography and perceived magic using artifacts from fictional sci-fi universes. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children Conference 458–469 (ACM, 2020).

  • 27.

    Edwards, C. Male professor turns himself into anime schoolgirl to teach students remotely during coronavirus lockdown. The U.S. Sun (18 March 2020);

  • 28.

    Kilteni, K., Bergstrom, I. & Slater, M. Drumming in immersive virtual reality: the body shapes the way we play. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19, 597–605 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Peck, T. C., Good, J. J. & Bourne, K. A. Inducing and mitigating stereotype threat through gendered virtual body-swap illusions. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–13 (ACM, 2020).

  • 30.

    Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N. & Segonds, F. Avatar-mediated creativity: when embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Comput. Human Behav. 61, 165–175 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Banakou, D., Kishore, S. & Slater, M. Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Front. Psychol. 9, 917 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Leong, J. et al. Exploring the use of real-time camera filters on embodiment and creativity. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–7 (ACM, 2021).

  • 33.

    Ames, C. Motivation: what teachers need to know. Teach. Coll. Rec. 91, 409–421 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Henderlong, J. & Lepper, M. R. The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 128, 774–795 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Shiomi, M., Okumura, S., Kimoto, M., Iio, T. & Shimohara, K. Two is better than one: social rewards from two agents enhance offline improvements in motor skills more than single agent. PLoS ONE 15, e0240622 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Kory-Westlund, J. M. & Breazeal, C. A long-term study of young children’s rapport, social emulation and language learning with a peer-like robot playmate in preschool. Front. Robot. AI 6, 81 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Musek, J. & Polic, M. in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (ed. Michalos, A. C.) 4752–4755 (Springer, 2014).

  • 39.

    National Institute of Mental Health. Mental illness; (accessed 8 October 2021).

  • 40.

    Torous, J. & Weiss Roberts, L. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health transparency and trusts. JAMA Psychiatry. 74, 437–438 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Zhou, L., Gao, J., Li, D. & Shum, H.-Y. The design and implementation of Xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot. Comput. Linguistics 46, 53–93 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Laranjo, L. et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 25, 1248–1258 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Gaffney, H., Mansell, W. & Tai, S. Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review. JMIR Mental Health 6, e14166 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Loveys, K., Fricchione, G., Kolappa, K., Sagar, M. & Broadbent, E. Reducing patient loneliness with artificial agents: design insights from evolutionary neuropsychiatry. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e13664 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Johnson, L. A. & Caldwell, B. E. Race, gender and therapist confidence: effects on satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship in MFT. Am. J. Family Therapy 39, 307–324 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Banerjee, A. & Sanyal, D. Dynamics of doctor-patient relationship: a cross-sectional study on concordance, trust and patient enablement. J. Family Community Med. 19, 12–19 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Matsangidou, M. et al. ‘Now i can see me’ designing a multi-user virtual reality remote psychotherapy for body weight and shape concerns. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2020).

  • 48.

    Vaidyam, A. N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J. D., Kashavan, M. S. & Torous, J. B. Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: a review of the psychiatric landscape. Can. J. Psychiatry 64, 456–464 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Carvalho, M. R. D., Freire, R. C. & Nardi, A. E. Virtual reality as a mechanism for exposure therapy. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 11, 220–230 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Hershfield, H. E. et al. Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. J. Mark. Res. 48, S23–S37 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Son, G.-R., Therrien, B. & Whall, A. Implicit memory and familiarity among elders with dementia. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 34, 263–267 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Pagnini, F. et al. Ageing as a mindset: a study protocol to rejuvenate older adults with a counterclockwise psychological intervention. BMJ Open 9, e030411 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Massimi, M., Odom, W., Kirk, D. & Banks, R. HCI at the end of life: understanding death, dying and the digital. In CHI10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 4477–4480 (ACM, 2010).

  • 54.

    Ohlheiser, A. The lonely reality of Zoom funerals. MIT Technology Review (13 April 2020);

  • 55.

    Massimi, M. & Baecker, R. M. Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1001–1010 (ACM, 2011).

  • 56.

    Newton, C. Speak, memory. The Verge (2016).

  • 57.

    Hamilton, I. What is wisdom? Business Insider (17 November 2018);

  • 58.

    Hayden, S. Mother meets recreation of her deceased child in VR (accessed 24 January 2021).

  • 59.

    Brooker, C. & Harris, O. Be right back. Episode of Black Mirror (2013).

  • 60.

    Villaronga, E. F. in Emotional Design in Human–Robot Interaction (eds Ayanoğlu, H. & Duarte, E.) 93–110 (Springer, 2019).

  • 61.

    Kapur, A. et al. Non-invasive silent speech recognition in multiple sclerosis with dysphonia. In Proc. Machine Learning for Health Workshop 25–38 (PMLR, 2020).

  • 62.

    Segalov, M. ‘i choose to thrive’: the man fighting motor neurone disease with cyborg technology. The Guardian (16 August 2021);

  • 63.

    Cudeiro, D., Bolkart, T., Laidlaw, C., Ranjan, A. & Black, M. J. Capture, learning and synthesis of 3D speaking styles. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 10093–10103 (IEEE, 2019).

  • 64.

    Li, T., Bolkart, T., Black, M. J., Li, H. & Romero, J. Learning a model of facial shape and expression from 4D scans. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 194 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Vougioukas, K., Petridis, S. & Pantic, M. Realistic speech-driven facial animation with GANs. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128, 1398–1413 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Siarohin, A., Lathuilière, S., Tulyakov, S., Ricci, E. & Sebe, N. First order motion model for image animation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (eds. Wallach, H. et al.) 7137–7147 (Curran Associates, 2019).

  • 67.

    Jemine, C. et al. Automatic Multispeaker Voice Cloning. MSc thesis, Université de Liège (2019).

  • 68.

    Sutton, R. E. Image manipulation: then and now. In Selected Readings from the Symposium of the International Visual Literacy Association (1993).

  • 69.

    Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J. & Szegedy, C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. Preprint at (2014).

  • 70.

    Rooney, B. Women and children first: technology and moral panic. The Wall Street Journal (11 June 2011);

  • 71.

    Thompson, C. Texting isn’t the first new technology thought to impair social skills. Smithsonian Magazine (March 20116);

  • 72.

    Müller, V. C. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy summer 2021 edn (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Stanford Univ., 2021);

  • 73.

    Langlois, S. ‘Donald Trump’ explains money laundering to his son-in-law in ‘deepfake’ video. Market Watch (19 September 2019);

  • 74.

    Rajendra-Nicolucci, C. Language-generating A.I. is a free speech nightmare. Slate (30 September 2020);

  • 75.

    Meskys, E., Kalpokiene, J., Jurcys, P. & Liaudanskas, A. Regulating deep fakes: legal and ethical considerations.J. Intellect. Prop. Law Pract. 15, 24–31 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Wagner, T. L. & Blewer, A. ‘The word real is no longer real’: deepfakes, gender, and the challenges of AI-altered video. Open Inf. Sci. 3, 32–46 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Fallis, D. The epistemic threat of deepfakes. Philos. Technol. (2020).

  • 78.

    In event of moon disaster (MIT Center For Advanced Virtuality, 2020);

  • 79.

    Ryan, E. The intersection of the Disney princess phenomenon and eating disorders. Response The Journal of Popular and American Culture (2016).

  • 80.

    Burroughs, B. Youtube kids: the app economy and mobile parenting. Soc. Media Soc. (2017).

  • 81.

    Primack, B. A. et al. Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the US. Am. J. Prev. Med. 53, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Umberson, D. & Karas Montez, J. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J. Health Soc. Behav. 51, S54–S66 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Radesky, J. S. & Christakis, D. A. Increased screen time: implications for early childhood development and behavior. Pediatr. Clin. 63, 827–839 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Shin, H. & Ryan, A. M. Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: teacher emotional support matters. Dev. Psychol. 53, 114–125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Chiu, T. K. Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: a qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learn. Environ. (2021).

  • 86.

    Abram, C. The most urgent threat of deepfakes isn’t politics. It’s porn. Vox (8 June 2020);

  • 87.

    Ankel, S. Many revenge porn victims consider suicide—why aren’t schools doing more to stop it. The Guardian (7 May 2018).

  • 88.

    Kugler, M. B. & Pace, C. Deepfake privacy: attitudes and regulation. Northwestern Public Law Research Paper, SSRN 21-04 (2021);

  • 89.

    Malaria Must Die. David Beckham launches the world’s first voice petition to end malaria (accessed 15 July 2015).

  • 90.

    Eshraghian, J. K. Human ownership of artificial creativity. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 157–160 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Baek, S. Free Speech in the Digital Age: Deepfakes and the Marketplace of Ideas. Honors theses (PPE), University of Pennsylvania. Penn Libraries (2020).

  • 92.

    Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K. & Marsh, E. J. Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 993–1002 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Amershi, S. et al. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proc. 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 3, 1–13 (ACM, 2019).

  • 94.

    Naruniec, J., Helminger, L., Schroers, C. & Weber, R. M. High-resolution neural face swapping for visual effects. In Proc. Computer Graphics Forum Vol. 39.4, 173–184 (Wiley, 2020).

  • 95.

    Ramanathan, M., Mishra, N. & Thalmann, N. M. Nadine humanoid social robotics platform. In Proc. Computer Graphics International Conference 490–496 (Springer, 2019).

  • 96.

    Claes, P. et al. Modeling 3D facial shape from DNA. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004224 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Zhu, W., Fan, X. & Zhang, Y. Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry. Virtual Reality Intell. Hardware 1, 558–579 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 98.

    Our first artificial human. Samsung Neon (accessed 10 July 2020).

  • 99.

    SoulMachines Inc. Baby X: soul machines. SoulMachines Inc. (accessed 10 July 2020).

  • 100.

    Corentin, J. Real-Time Voice Cloning. MSc thesis, Université de Liège (2019).

  • Spread the love

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.